Salem Radio Network News Tuesday, October 7, 2025

Politics

Trump’s threat to invoke Insurrection Act escalates showdown with Democratic cities

Carbonatix Pre-Player Loader

Audio By Carbonatix

By Emily Schmall and Andrea Shalal

CHICAGO (Reuters) -Donald Trump’s threat to invoke a federal anti-insurrection law to deploy troops to more U.S. cities has intensified his legal battle with Democratic leaders over the limits of presidential authority, as hundreds of National Guard soldiers from Texas prepared to start patrolling in Chicago as early as Tuesday.

The Republican president on Tuesday again left open the possibility that he might utilize the centuries-old Insurrection Act in an effort to sidestep any court rulings blocking his orders to send Guard troops into cities over the objections of local and state officials.

A federal judge has temporarily barred Guard troops from heading to Portland, Oregon, though a separate judge has allowed for now a deployment to proceed in Chicago, where federal agents have embarked on a sweeping crackdown on illegal immigration.

“Well, it’s been invoked before,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office, who has claimed troops are needed to protect federal property and personnel in carrying out their duties, as well as assisting an overall drive to suppress crime. “If you look at Chicago, Chicago is a great city where there’s a lot of crime, and if the governor can’t do the job, we’ll do the job. It’s all very simple.”

The law, which gives the president authority to deploy the military to quell unrest in an emergency, has typically been used only in extreme cases, and almost always at the invitation of state governors. The act was last invoked by President George H.W. Bush during the Los Angeles riots of 1992.

Under federal law, National Guard and other military troops are generally prohibited from conducting civilian law enforcement. But the Insurrection Act allows for an exception, giving troops the power to directly police and arrest people.

Using the act would represent a significant escalation of Trump’s effort to deploy the military to Democratic cities. Since his second term as president began in January, he has shown little hesitation in seeking to wield governmental authority against his political opponents, as he pushes to expand the powers of the presidency in ways that have tested the limits of the law.

Last week, in a speech to top military commanders, Trump suggested using U.S. cities as “training grounds” for the armed forces, alarming Democrats and civil liberties groups.

Randy Manner, a retired Army major general who served as acting vice chief of the National Guard Bureau, said using the Insurrection Act in the way Trump appears to be contemplating has no real precedent.

“It’s an extremely dangerous slope, because it essentially says the president can just do about whatever he chooses,” said Manner, who served under both Republican and Democratic administrations before retiring in 2012. “It’s absolutely, absolutely the definition of dictatorship and fascism.”

TRUMP TARGETS CHICAGO, PORTLAND

Trump has ordered Guard troops to Chicago, the third-largest U.S. city, and Portland, Oregon, following his earlier deployments to Los Angeles and Washington, D.C. In each case, he has done so despite staunch opposition from Democratic mayors and governors, who say Trump’s claims of lawlessness and violence do not reflect reality.

In Chicago and Portland, protests over Trump’s immigration policies had been largely peaceful and relatively limited in size, according to local officials, far from the “war zone” conditions described by Trump. 

Since the surge of federal agents to the Chicago area last month, the demonstrations have done little to upset life in a city where violent crime has fallen sharply. Restaurants and theaters are busy as ever, and crowds have flocked to lakefront beaches to enjoy an unusual stretch of warm weather.

Protests have been much less disruptive than the unrest in 2020 triggered by the death of George Floyd, an unarmed Black man, at the hands of Minneapolis police officers.

The most regular demonstration has taken place outside an immigration processing facility in suburban Broadview. Several dozen people have been engaged in increasingly violent standoffs with federal officers, who have fired tear gas and rubber bullets at them. Several people, including at least one reporter, have been arrested, and dozens of people have been injured.

GOVERNOR ALLEGES TRUMP USING GUARD AS PROPS

Illinois Governor JB Pritzker, a Democrat, accused Trump of intentionally trying to foment violence, which the president could then use to justify further militarization.

“Donald Trump is using our service members as political props and as pawns in his illegal effort to militarize our nation’s cities,” Pritzker said on Monday. 

Illinois and Chicago sued the Trump administration on Monday, seeking to block orders to federalize 300 Illinois Guard troops and send 400 Texas Guard troops to Chicago. During a hearing, Justice Department lawyers told a federal judge that Texas Guard troops were already in transit to Illinois.

The judge, April Perry, permitted the deployment to proceed for now but ordered the U.S. government to file a response by Wednesday.

Separately, a federal judge in Oregon on Sunday temporarily blocked the administration from sending any troops to police Portland, the state’s largest city.

National Guard troops are state-based militia who normally answer to the governors of their states and are often deployed in response to natural disasters.

During Trump’s deployments to various cities, the Guard has been limited to protecting federal agents and property, though the Defense Department has said troops have the authority to detain people temporarily.

Any effort by Trump to invoke the Insurrection Act would also likely face legal challenges. While the law has rarely been interpreted by the courts, the Supreme Court has ruled that the president alone can determine if the act’s conditions have been met. Those conditions include when the U.S. government’s authority is facing “unlawful obstructions, combinations or assemblages or rebellion.”

The act, a version of which was first enacted in 1792, has been used by past presidents to deploy troops within the U.S. in response to crises such as rise of the Ku Klux Klan after the American Civil War.

(Reporting by Andrea Shalal in Washington and Emily Schmall in Chicago; Additional reporting by Tom Hals, Jan Wolfe and Dietrich Knauth; Writing by Joseph Ax; Editing by Frank McGurty and Nick Zieminski)

Previous
Next
The Media Line News
Salem Media, our partners, and affiliates use cookies and similar technologies to enhance your browsing experience, analyze site traffic, personalize site content, and deliver relevant video recommendations. By using this website and continuing to navigate, you consent to our use of such technologies and the sharing of video viewing activity with third-party partners in accordance with the Video Privacy Protection Act and other privacy laws. Privacy Policy
OK
X CLOSE