Supreme Court, siding with Starbucks, makes it harder for NLRB to win court orders in labor disputes

( ) -q-27- UNDATED (Correspondent Jeremy House) “orders, or injunctions.”

The Supreme Court has made it harder for the federal government to win court orders when it suspects a company of interfering in unionization campaigns.

[CutID: <Cuts> SCOTUS-STARBUCKS-house-q-FRIam.mp3
Time: 27s
Title: SCOTUS-STARBUCKS-house-q-FRIam
Out-cue: orders, or injunctions]

TAG: Correspondent Jeremy House reporting.

——————————-
VERBATIM: The high court was acting on a case that stemmed from a labor dispute with Starbucks. The justices tightened the standards for when a federal court should issue an order to protect the jobs of workers during a union organizing campaign. The court rejected a rule that some courts had applied to orders sought by the National Labor Relations Board in favor of a higher threshold, sought by Starbucks, that must be met in most other fights over court orders, or injunctions.