( ) -q-24- UNDATED (Correspondent Jeremy House) “interests among others.” Charles and Kathleen Moore are about to have their day in the Supreme Court over a $15,000 tax bill they believe is unconstitutional. [CutID: <Cuts> SCOTUS-IRS-BILL-house-q-MONam.mp3 Time: 24s Title: SCOTUS-IRS-BILL-house-q-MONam Out-cue: interests among others] TAG: Correspondent Jeremy House reporting. ————————— VERBATIM: The case could upend […]
Audio
Supreme Court dispute over $15,000 IRS bill puts focus on never-enacted billionaire tax
( ) -q-24- UNDATED (Correspondent Jeremy House) “interests among others.”
Charles and Kathleen Moore are about to have their day in the Supreme Court over a $15,000 tax bill they believe is unconstitutional.
[CutID: <Cuts> SCOTUS-IRS-BILL-house-q-MONam.mp3
Time: 24s
Title: SCOTUS-IRS-BILL-house-q-MONam
Out-cue: interests among others]
TAG: Correspondent Jeremy House reporting.
—————————
VERBATIM: The case could upend parts of the U.S. tax code and rule out a much-discussed but never-enacted tax on wealth. The Washington state couple claim they had to pay because of their investment in an Indian company, even though Charles Moore said they never received any distribution, dividend or other payment from the company. The Moores are the public face of a high court case that’s being backed by business interests among others.